<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Source VHDL Verification Methodology | Brian Padalino | Activity</title>
	<link>https://osvvm.org/members/bpadalino/activity</link>
	<atom:link href="https://osvvm.org/members/bpadalino/activity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Brian Padalino.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 21:28:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cebe938aa9acd11c12dfa469f071fde8</guid>
				<title>Brian Padalino started the topic Coding/Naming Conventions in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/codingnaming-conventions</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:02:11 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently downloaded the OSVVM package and was looking it over. &nbsp;Something that was striking was the naming conventions in the packages which seemed, to me, somewhat inconsistent.For an example, I am looking at RandomPkg.vhd in the package declaration. &nbsp;One observation is that VHDL is insensitive to case, so <code>DISTTYPE</code> is the same as <code>DistType</code>.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5216"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/codingnaming-conventions" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>