I’m not sure if this is an OSVVM issue, a QuestaSim issue or an NVC issue, could you help me identify where/if this should be raised please? or if my VHDL is wrong that is using OSVVM.

This code runs successfully in Questa but gives an error when run in NVC:

** Error: type of index BOOLEAN does not match type of array dimension…[Read more]

To merge results:
vcover merge merged.ucdb run1.ucdb run2.ucdb run3.ucdb

Then the normal “report” to view the combined report:
vcover report merged.ucdb

Note, the VHDL has to be identical otherwise you’re trying to merge results that are not aligned, I think Questa gives an error.

When I track coverage of a signal using CoverageIDType, the Alert Results table always shows it with a pass value of 0. Then the…[Read more]

Thanks for the update and the clarification.

Exactly as you say, my main desire is parallelising the test execution. If I have 24 test cases and 24 simulator licenses, I’d like to complete the entire suite in one hour by running everything in parallel, rather than taking 24 hours to complete sequentially. Its common for us to have…[Read more]

I’m hoping to be able to run my test cases on different machines and then combine everything into one HTML report (transcripts, code coverage, and functional coverage).

Is there a way in OSVVM to gather all these separate results into a single HTML report? I’d like to merge logs, coverage data, and any pass/fail info for the test c…[Read more]

First time posting here! I’m currently early in the adoption of OSVVM. I work for a company that develops safety critical FPGAs and we put lots of emphasis (and rely) on planning and documentation artefacts. I’ve encountered a few questions and would greatly appreciate your guidance and insights.

1. Writing a Test…[Read more]