<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Source VHDL Verification Methodology | Mikael | Activity</title>
	<link>https://osvvm.org/members/mickedykare/activity</link>
	<atom:link href="https://osvvm.org/members/mickedykare/activity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Mikael.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:21:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0bf9a0133e18484cd3ccfff2ff7079b3</guid>
				<title>Mikael replied to the topic Safer Check if Simulation passed or Not in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/safer-check-if-simulation-passed-or-not#post-2787</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:53:49 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Report APIs should be there in Questa sim 2025.2.<br />
The latest Questasim version is now 2025.3</p>
<p>Remember that today, mixed language designs are very common. Some IPs are only available in Verilog.<br />
So it is not just VHDL assertions that can be a source of errors.<br />
There could be SVA assertions, both immediate and concurrent.</p>
<p>IPs or library&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10882"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/safer-check-if-simulation-passed-or-not#post-2787" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4509a91584be8ad2fa78a118ddee294a</guid>
				<title>Mikael replied to the topic Safer Check if Simulation passed or Not in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/safer-check-if-simulation-passed-or-not#post-2785</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 08:50:22 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By saving the UCDB file for each testcase (&lt;testname&gt;.ucdb , you can also check the teststatus afterwards:</p>
<p><code>&gt;vcover attribute OsvvmTemp_Questa/TbAxi4_DemoMemoryReadWrite1.ucdb</code></p>
<p>The tcl procedure I use to check the test status,just contact me and I will send it. Seems like the code is blocked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">90854e07a6c7ae7906a7532561105c6c</guid>
				<title>Mikael started the topic Safer Check if Simulation passed or Not in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/safer-check-if-simulation-passed-or-not</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 08:48:25 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the outcome of the simulation is solely dependent on the OSVVM report server and if you have triggered an error or not.<br />
But if you have for example an external library cell/ip that uses assertions, it can still look as the simulation passed while it indeed failed.</p>
<p>I added &#8220;assert false&#8221; in a testcase to illustrate the problem.  This is the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10877"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/safer-check-if-simulation-passed-or-not" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4495f70f165550ea9f67ea6b5930e64f</guid>
				<title>Mikael became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/activity/p/10873</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:07:41 +0100</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>