<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Source VHDL Verification Methodology | Ariel | Activity</title>
	<link>https://osvvm.org/members/ariel/activity</link>
	<atom:link href="https://osvvm.org/members/ariel/activity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Ariel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:46:08 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9b0c0c0a236362f4f17284673efbdb49</guid>
				<title>Ariel replied to the topic Waveforms not generated correctly (GHDL) in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/waveforms-not-generated-correctly-ghdl#post-2708</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 16:36:59 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I think you might have an old GHDL version. </p>
<p><code></code>`<br />
$ rlwrap -c tclsh<br />
$ source ../OsvvmLibraries/Scripts/StartUp.tcl<br />
OSVVM Script Version:  2025.02<br />
Simulator Version:     GHDL-5.0.0-dev<br />
<code></code>`</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b27a55ccc4cbe2751e4bb0068d62667c</guid>
				<title>Ariel replied to the topic Waveforms not generated correctly (GHDL) in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/waveforms-not-generated-correctly-ghdl#post-2641</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 10:13:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually both, to have a robust test.</p>
<p>For the former, just to be clear, , I have an AxiStreamReceiver and I am testing my DUT which has an axis master. So, I want to assert in the TestCase tready before tvalid or after tvalid (1, 2, n clock cycles). Is that what you meant? Is there any example to follow? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b4f94559feb4a48ff77ef060b2748a46</guid>
				<title>Ariel replied to the topic Waveforms not generated correctly (GHDL) in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/waveforms-not-generated-correctly-ghdl#post-2639</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:37:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick,</p>
<p>Thank you for the clear answer. Makes total sense to skip the post-synthesis simulation then for my purpose. I am in fact using the OSVVM AXI Stream components which have tpd. I have a design with mainly several axi streams, so I am following the testcase <code>OsvvmLibraries/AXI4/AxiStream/TestCases/TbStream_SendGetDemo1.vhd</code>.</p>
<p>I need to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10619"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/waveforms-not-generated-correctly-ghdl#post-2639" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d154f6c2c75e78aeeca7658331aa95c6</guid>
				<title>Ariel replied to the topic Waveforms not generated correctly (GHDL) in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/waveforms-not-generated-correctly-ghdl#post-2637</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 17:14:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using Vivado, with behavioral simulation for debugging and step-by-step investigation. Then, I can run all the tests with GHDL, because as you said, Vivado is very slow. </p>
<p>I am getting the same results in behavioral simulation in vivado and also in GHDL. As I want to be sure that post-synthesis works without generating a bitstream (which&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10617"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/waveforms-not-generated-correctly-ghdl#post-2637" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">22ae1aa076a9f75d3d51fbc86d31cc76</guid>
				<title>Ariel replied to the topic Bug in AxiStream Receiver for SetAxiStreamOptions that changes WaitForGet in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/bug-in-axistream-receiver-for-setaxistreamoptions-that-changes-waitforget#post-2635</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 17:12:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: I re-transmitted again and on the second batch of data, then a_ready_in is asserted the clock cycles I set with RECEIVE_READY_DELAY_CYCLES. See here: <a href="https://ibb.co/MxD4D0fF" rel="nofollow ugc">https://ibb.co/MxD4D0fF</a></p>
<p>Is there any specific reason? Is it possible to set at the beginning of the process whether tready should be 1 or 0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c6b9bf64c3718e79bf39953be9a5485a</guid>
				<title>Ariel replied to the topic Bug in AxiStream Receiver for SetAxiStreamOptions that changes WaitForGet in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/bug-in-axistream-receiver-for-setaxistreamoptions-that-changes-waitforget#post-2634</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 16:54:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,</p>
<p>Are there any updates on this? </p>
<p>I am also looking to not having tready asserted by the receiver at the beginning, but instead using RECEIVE_READY_BEFORE_VALID=FALSE and RECEIVE_READY_DELAY_CYCLES to assert tready after tvalid is asserted. See here <a href="https://ibb.co/jZVyy9ZH" rel="nofollow ugc">https://ibb.co/jZVyy9ZH</a><br />
Thank you.</p>
<p>ps: Do you have a new and updated documentation for the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10611"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/bug-in-axistream-receiver-for-setaxistreamoptions-that-changes-waitforget#post-2634" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5f8fc272022a90c855648bfb687307e1</guid>
				<title>Ariel replied to the topic Bug in AxiStream Receiver for SetAxiStreamOptions that changes WaitForGet in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/bug-in-axistream-receiver-for-setaxistreamoptions-that-changes-waitforget#post-2633</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 16:48:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,</p>
<p>Are there any updates on this? </p>
<p>I am also looking to not having tready asserted by the receiver at the beginning, but instead using RECEIVE_READY_BEFORE_VALID=FALSE and RECEIVE_READY_DELAY_CYCLES to assert tready after tvalid is asserted.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cafd79473fd87853923599cf564167f3</guid>
				<title>Ariel replied to the topic Waveforms not generated correctly (GHDL) in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/waveforms-not-generated-correctly-ghdl#post-2632</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 19:31:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course! I assumed gtkwave would update when updating to the latest ghdl version. It wasn&#8217;t the case. Now with gtkwave 3.3.221 it opens as expected.</p>
<p>What about running the simulation in vivado? I&#8217;m mostly interested in post synthesis functional simulation as I have a vhdl module currently that works fine in behavioral simulation and works&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10606"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/waveforms-not-generated-correctly-ghdl#post-2632" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">18fc25ec77daa7b0e570072e62ac94f4</guid>
				<title>Ariel started the topic Waveforms not generated correctly (GHDL) in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/waveforms-not-generated-correctly-ghdl</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:45:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I&#8217;ve just started learning about OSVVM and I want to see the wave forms after the simulation to help me debug. I am currently using GHDL.<br />
I have a custom DUT, which I can see its simulation in Vivado (2024.1) with a testbench that doesn&#8217;t include any OSVVM-related code. The DUT involves a master and slave axi stream, so I duplicated the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10601"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/waveforms-not-generated-correctly-ghdl" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">211225b0d372388e95b7b1b1844902c3</guid>
				<title>Ariel became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/activity/p/10593</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:37:35 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>