<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Source VHDL Verification Methodology | Oliver | Activity</title>
	<link>https://osvvm.org/members/oliver/activity</link>
	<atom:link href="https://osvvm.org/members/oliver/activity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Oliver.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:53:02 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1dd6e38de9aa66aff2bdc106fca15dd1</guid>
				<title>Oliver started the topic Xilinx not supporting VHDL anymore? in the forum VHDL</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/xilinx-not-supporting-vhdl-anymore</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:15:32 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if / why Xilinx doesn&#8217;t support VHDL anymore:<br />
In the Feb 16, 2023 Xilinx document 63988 &#8211; &#8220;How to run timing simulation using Vivado Simulator?&#8221; it is stated: &#8220;There is no support for VHDL timing simulation.&#8221;<br />
And in the Feb 16, 2023 Xilinx article &#8220;Simulating AXI interfaces with the AXI Verification IP (AXI VIP)&#8221; it says that &#8220;All of the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9685"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/xilinx-not-supporting-vhdl-anymore" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a8094dc7c74472d03582c094aae7835e</guid>
				<title>Oliver replied to the topic Verification with SystemVerilog or VHDL in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/verification-with-systemverilog-or-vhdl#post-2144</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:11:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,<br />
thanks for the link. Now that I finally got my tools working I will have a look at it soon. The OSVVM demo tests look good and run well (not when following the old user&#8217;s guide in the OSVVM Examples zip archive on this site though). Unfortunately the simulation of Xilinx PCIe-demo-design with Vivado will not run when the language is set to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9565"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/verification-with-systemverilog-or-vhdl#post-2144" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">22419b922de1c951f258d075573f14c9</guid>
				<title>Oliver replied to the topic Verification with SystemVerilog or VHDL in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/verification-with-systemverilog-or-vhdl#post-2114</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 14:11:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,</p>
<p>thank you for the detailed answers! </p>
<p>Actually I&#8217;m looking at the PCIe test framework from Xilinx. The AXI I&#8217;m planning to verify is already included in OSVVM, as I could see. For QSPI as another task I will probably need to write my own.</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
Oliver </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4858506c3ed8c1861538039ad5fda870</guid>
				<title>Oliver started the topic Verification with SystemVerilog or VHDL in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/verification-with-systemverilog-or-vhdl</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 09:49:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
regarding OSVVM for verification of FPGA design I have a question.<br />
My colleague told me, that we need to use SystemVerilog instead of VHDL for a new project. The problem he sees is that Xilinx provides the cores in Verilog and the test framework in System-VL. Only this is automatically built and provided by the demo. If we wanted to take&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9080"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/verification-with-systemverilog-or-vhdl" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fd66e6e5012f9cfae7b79a2c64ff37ad</guid>
				<title>Oliver became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/activity/p/9020</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 22:36:28 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>