<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Source VHDL Verification Methodology | Iztok | Activity</title>
	<link>https://osvvm.org/members/iztokjeras/activity</link>
	<atom:link href="https://osvvm.org/members/iztokjeras/activity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Iztok.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 21:28:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">216ac5a94e16d9f158069e147b821368</guid>
				<title>Iztok replied to the topic Xilinx not supporting VHDL anymore? in the forum VHDL</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/xilinx-not-supporting-vhdl-anymore#post-2203</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 10:01:32 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivado 2022.2 simulator states to supports VHDL-2008. While this is meant to mean full support, there certainly are still many issues present. The focus was probably to support language features already supported in synthesis.</p>
<p>I personally tested support for VHDL-2008 fixed point number libraries, which require generic packages.</p>
<p>Vivado 2023.1&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9706"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/xilinx-not-supporting-vhdl-anymore#post-2203" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">06de3ac131b0ff3df1bc43d44c4752aa</guid>
				<title>Iztok replied to the topic Running example test-benches with GHDL in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/running-example-test-benches-with-ghdl#post-1836</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:22:58 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I was able to get the Axi4 and Axi4-Stream tests to work.<br />
The above log also list the UART test, which is still failing (I checked again today).</p>
<p><code><br />
ghdl --elab-run ended with error ghdl:error: overflow detected<br />
in process .tbuart(testharness).uartrx_1@uartrx(model).P1<br />
  from: process osvvm_uart.uartrx(model).P1 at UartRx.vhd:359<br />
ghdl:error:&hellip;</code><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6702"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/running-example-test-benches-with-ghdl#post-1836" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4422a932b265a310997e0b3f7e836d1a</guid>
				<title>Iztok started the topic Running example test-benches with GHDL in the forum OSVVM</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/running-example-test-benches-with-ghdl</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:22:55 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to run the latest Git version of OSVVM with the latest Git version of GHDL, all on Ubuntu 20.04.<br />
Two tests I tried (AXI4Lite, UART) failed with what seems to be GHDL failures rather early into the build process (before simulation). Am I doing something wrong? Is this a known issue? Is there a combination of GHDL/OSVVM release tags, which&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6697"><a href="https://osvvm.org/forums/topic/running-example-test-benches-with-ghdl" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">76c3c05ee394dfe29b79ea864792c50e</guid>
				<title>Iztok became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://osvvm.org/activity/p/6694</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:02:14 +0100</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>