Reply To: CoveragePkg useful for transitions?

Hi Jim,

thank you for your quick response. I think it is still faster to use the cross coverage feature than simple randomization of the operations.

What I would like to have is e.g.,

add -> sub -> mul -> div

and what I can check with cross coverage is

(add -> sub), (sub -> mul), (mul -> div)

So in the optimal case I would need to perform (#transitions + 1) operations. With cross coverage as it is currently implemented in the package it is (#transitions * 2) operations. So it’s not too bad.

Best Regards,

Matthias