The myth of ‘randc’ Ian Gibbins April 17, 2012 OS-VVM in general, Randomization 1 Related Posts Are random number generators really random? Why Functional Coverage? randc in OSVVM – another view RandCovPoint for Item/Point coverage 1 Comment Jim Lewis April 20, 2012, 09:21 Log in to Reply For a dissenting opinion, see my post, “randc in OSVVM – another view.” In short, Intelligent Coverage can do randc. OTOH, randc is not the goal, the goal is covering all of the coverage bins. These coverage bins need to work in terms of ranges and also have different coverage goals – all of which is handled nicely by OSVVM. Leave a Reply Cancel ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment.