Reply To: CoveragePkg useful for transitions?
thank you for your quick response. I think it is still faster to use the cross coverage feature than simple randomization of the operations.
What I would like to have is e.g.,
add -> sub -> mul -> div
and what I can check with cross coverage is
(add -> sub), (sub -> mul), (mul -> div)
So in the optimal case I would need to perform (#transitions + 1) operations. With cross coverage as it is currently implemented in the package it is (#transitions * 2) operations. So it’s not too bad.