Activity

Ha, very nice.

In my current system test bench of a AXI-QDMA Interface I model memory using my own dictionary implementation. First I used plain `std_logic_vector`, but it became slower & slower with increasing writes to new addresses in the dict. Then I’ve remembered that integers are “faster” than values with 9-state logic. So I’ve done something similar to your MemoryPkg, using an `integer_vector(0 to 1)` to store 64-bit wide `std_logic_vector` values, and also using integers for the address in the dictionary.

I’ve looked into an older version of your MemoryPkg before, which was limited to 31 bit – which was the reason for my own memory implementation. Now that this restriction is gone, it’s maybe finally time to try OSVVMs MemoryPkg.

Greetings,
Torsten