Ariel

Actually both, to have a robust test.

For the former, just to be clear, , I have an AxiStreamReceiver and I am testing my DUT which has an axis master. So, I want to assert in the TestCase tready before tvalid or after tvalid (1, 2, n clock cycles). Is that what you meant? Is there any example to follow?

Hi Patrick,

Thank you for the clear answer. Makes total sense to skip the post-synthesis simulation then for my purpose. I am in fact using the OSVVM AXI Stream components which have tpd. I have a design with mainly several axi streams, so I am following the testcase OsvvmLibraries/AXI4/AxiStream/TestCases/TbStream_SendGetDemo1.vhd.

I need to…[Read more]

I am using Vivado, with behavioral simulation for debugging and step-by-step investigation. Then, I can run all the tests with GHDL, because as you said, Vivado is very slow.

I am getting the same results in behavioral simulation in vivado and also in GHDL. As I want to be sure that post-synthesis works without generating a bitstream (which…[Read more]

Update: I re-transmitted again and on the second batch of data, then a_ready_in is asserted the clock cycles I set with RECEIVE_READY_DELAY_CYCLES. See here: https://ibb.co/MxD4D0fF

Is there any specific reason? Is it possible to set at the beginning of the process whether tready should be 1 or 0?

Hi Jim,

Are there any updates on this?

I am also looking to not having tready asserted by the receiver at the beginning, but instead using RECEIVE_READY_BEFORE_VALID=FALSE and RECEIVE_READY_DELAY_CYCLES to assert tready after tvalid is asserted. See here https://ibb.co/jZVyy9ZH
Thank you.

ps: Do you have a new and updated documentation for the…[Read more]

Hi Jim,

Are there any updates on this?

I am also looking to not having tready asserted by the receiver at the beginning, but instead using RECEIVE_READY_BEFORE_VALID=FALSE and RECEIVE_READY_DELAY_CYCLES to assert tready after tvalid is asserted.

Thank you.

Of course! I assumed gtkwave would update when updating to the latest ghdl version. It wasn’t the case. Now with gtkwave 3.3.221 it opens as expected.

What about running the simulation in vivado? I’m mostly interested in post synthesis functional simulation as I have a vhdl module currently that works fine in behavioral simulation and works…[Read more]